I saw a description for a course someone is offering on learning to recognize myths and archetypes in current events. What a good idea for a course--because how challenging is it to separate the real story from the apparently real in the news we see every day? Separating the false from the true is both an art and a science, and familiarity with myths can be a great help in discernment.
It helps, as I've said before, to view the political stage as just that--a stage. It's the practiced performance you see, not actors standing around being themselves (with a few exceptions). Unrehearsed events are so rare that it makes me wonder how often reporters even ask the right questions. I get the feeling sometimes that press events, talk shows, and public appearances of all kinds are predicated from the word "go" on certain things not being asked, so that it's not a matter of an official parrying a tough question or refusing to comment on something. The conversation never even gets to that point.
I've read reports in the news media that President Obama has been showing more emotion lately, as if to imply that he's "loosening up" and revealing a more human side. I view those reports with some skepticism, based on my observation that almost everything that happens in politics happens for a stone cold reason. I'm not saying that the President doesn't have any of the emotions he might be displaying, but I am saying that if he's letting you see them, that's a calculated decision on his part (the same goes for other warm and fuzzy Washington people).
Was there a time when being presidential carried more gravitas and less of the aura of carnival side show, or am I just imagining that? President Obama seems to want us to think that he's a great guy with feelings just like ours, a sense of humor, lovable foibles, etc., and that he's not even above appearing in someone's garage to record a podcast. I know this folksiness is meant to be disarming, but what I find interesting (and disconcerting) is the fact that Mr. Obama works so hard at projecting this image.
I try to read events--whether they're press conferences, speeches, interviews, or news items--a little like advertisements and a little like poems. If it's an ad, what are they trying to sell me? What's the motive? What's the gain? Reading an event like a poem means reading intuitively or slantwise--literal understanding is just the beginning. The more elusive truths only appear if you don't stare at them head-on but listen instead to your gut feelings.
Here's a Greek myth that surfaced for me this afternoon, in thinking about our President: Poseidon sent King Minos a beautiful white bull, a magnificent animal that, because it was sacred, was meant to be sacrificed to the gods. Minos coveted this bull, and instead of offering it up, decided to keep it for himself, substituting a lesser animal in its place. Much havoc ensued from this self-serving act; Minos' wife even fell in love with the bull, which led to the birth of a monster, the insatiable Minotaur, and the need for an elaborate labyrinth in which to hide it.
The currency in this myth concerns the bait-and-switch, which in our day is the slick appearance and trappings of power as a substitute for the true working of democracy. In matters of personal rights, trade, and economic justice for ordinary citizens, the President, as I see it, is too often on the side of the moneyed and the powerful (a true son of Zeus, like Minos)--but he doesn't want it to look that way. So in place of that just, self-sacrificing, and courageous leader of the free world that we need but don't have, he gladly offers up a shiny, photogenic, and urbane substitute. We'd like to believe it's the real thing, but the truth is, you know, it's just some old bull. And you're not fooled, because you know your mythology.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Thursday, June 18, 2015
Buddy Holly's Glasses
I checked out two library books a couple of weeks ago and read them back to back. Both were novels, one by an American and one by a Briton. I was deep into the second one when I came across a character described as having Buddy Holly glasses. This was an interesting coincidence because the first novel also had a character with Buddy Holly glasses. Synchronicity or accident?
It's not an earth-shattering coincidence, but it was odd enough. What are the chances of bringing home two unrelated novels and finding that same descriptor? Not great, I would guess. There was no obvious connection between the books, but it got me thinking about possible reasons for the use of the same image by different authors.
In David Guterson's The Other, the glasses belong to Rand Barry, the wealthy father of John William, a dropout, rebel, philosopher, and Gnostic. Neil Countryman, who narrates the story, is John William's best friend, aiding and abetting him in dropping out of society and out of sight to a precarious backwoods existence. Rand Barry's glasses are described this way: "This style of glasses . . . has waxed and waned, but mostly they've functioned as a comic prop or as a prosthetic for the elderly urbane, sometimes appearing on the faces of mods or dissonantly on generals hauled before the press."
In Ian McEwan's On Chesil Beach, the glasses belong to a minor character named Harold Mather, who has them broken by a street punk as he and the story's protagonist, Edward Mayhew, are walking down a London street in early 1961. His glasses seem less likely to be an affectation (Mr. Barry sports his in 1974), and in any case, suit his character, a hip but nerdy university student who has "an important jazz record collection . . . [and] was hilarious in formal student union debates."
While Guterson describes Barry as a somewhat anxious and uncomfortable figure, despite his wealth, and McEwan's Mather is in his element as a successful and well-regarded intellectual, both scenes describe the removal of the glasses, in one case by the wearer himself and in the other by a violent act. In different ways, both characters are hapless. Barry thinks he's about to be attacked by his son's friend, whom he does not at first recognize, and removes his glasses in a sort of nervous gesture. Mather has them knocked from his head but brushes the incident off, becoming upset with Edward for coming to his defense.
Is there any larger theme in the novels that might connect these seemingly minor incidents? Both novels deal with loneliness, alienation, and the tension between societal norms and the individual. Mr. Barry, as John William's father, is the focus of much of what John William rebels against, and he's not unaware of the role he plays, at least to some degree. Nervously removing his glasses in Neil's presence almost comes across as an unconscious attempt to unmask himself, a futile but poignant gesture in light of his estrangement from his son.
In the case of Harold Mather, it's Edward who takes the damage to the glasses seriously. While Harold takes the incident in stride, Edward enacts a macho revenge, seeing the matter as a point of pride. The lack of respect for his friend "justifies" his violent reprisal. When I first read this scene, I was surprised that Harold grew upset with (and dropped) his friend over the episode, which seemed to express little more than Edward's instinct to protect. By the end of the novel, I was seeing the incident as evidence of an unfortunate impetuosity, an adherence to a macho code that precludes a more nuanced approach to situations. It was Harold who lost his glasses, but Edward who lacked the ability to "see."
The glasses are in both cases part of a persona relatively easily dropped, in one case deliberately, and the other by accident. Authenticity is achieved to different degrees by Barry and Mather and their counterpoints, Neil and Edward. Mr. Barry seems to realize that his son's friend knows more about his son than he does, even if the realization does him little good. To what extent does he "see" that his son rejects everything he stands for? Harold, on the other hand, sees enough, even without his glasses, to make him reassess his friendship with Edward.
More than aids to vision, more than parts of a mask, the glasses act also as reflectors, as mirrors in which the other character sees himself. For Neil, as he recounts the scene years later, complicated questions of love, loyalty, complicity, and guilt are reflected back. For Edward, an image of who he is as a young man, not yet deepened by experience, chastens him but fails to foster inner change. In one case, the reflection reveals greater depths, while in the other, what shows is mostly an image shaped by social norms.
Why Buddy Holly's glasses? Because of Holly's untimely death, they carry associations with tragedy and early loss that seem to foreshadow later events in both novels. Certainly, the image of Buddy Holly, in conjunction with the character of Rand Barry, an aerospace executive, is both incongruous and apt. For Mather, who seems comfortable with himself as a man despite some physical drawbacks, the glasses are more of a mirror cracked, in which Edward sees, but does not recognize, himself.
Thursday, June 11, 2015
Stollen's Clock Repair, Toy & Magic Shop
Once upon a time, there was a woman who lived alone
on a long, leafy street with old-fashioned houses. She was a fairly young
woman, with no husband or children to think of, and she liked to spend her
spare time (she was a teacher) reading, taking walks, drinking long cups of
tea, and (on Saturdays) occasionally rummaging in antique shops.
The box did indeed fit snugly on her dresser, and
her jewelry fit neatly into the partitions she created for them. She casually
mentioned her find to several of the other teachers at her college in the
break room one morning. They agreed that Stollen's was the place to go when you
didn't know what you wanted because you were bound to find it. It was a small
town, and everyone knew Stollen's.
By and by, the young woman, whose name was Clare,
began to notice something odd happening among her colleagues. It began with
whispers and hurried looks and was never more than a faint rumor at first. She eventually discovered that the rumors had to
do with her jewelry box, which some said had belonged to a wealthy governor of
a far-off place, some to a captain of industry, and some to a potentate. It was
said to have a hidden compartment housing a secret document, a document that
had been left by mistake in the box, which by some roundabout and uncertain way
had ended up at last in a dusty corner of Stollen's shop.
Clare did not believe the rumors at first, knowing
how little of import happened in her small town and how exciting the slightest
hint of the exotic always was (when the circus came, it was the major topic of
conversation for weeks). But gradually, rumors turned into a coolness in the
air, and there were frightened looks and hushed voices. She was never sure who
started the stories, or if anyone really knew anything for sure about the box.
When she asked Mr. Stollen one day, after running into him on the street, he merely
shook his head.
Whether Clare believed the rumors or not, it was
evident that other people did. One autumn evening, when Clare was returning
home from school, she encountered a well-dressed gentleman at the end of her
street. He was idling there with an air of purpose, and when she turned in
front of him, he bowed slightly. "My name is Mars," he said, handing
her a card on which the name P. T. Mars appeared in elegant black
lettering, followed by the word "Antiquities." "I understand you
purchased a box from old Stollen some time ago. I wonder if you'd be interested
in selling it to me. I'm a collector, and I believe it may have some
value."
"Really?" said Clare. "Mr. Stollen said nothing about value to me, and he always knows these things. I didn't pay
very much for it. It's only lacquered wood."
"Ah, but you see, the look of a thing can be
deceiving. Who would think that a tarnished old lamp could hide a genie, for
instance? Yet one hears of these things."
Clare did not like the look of this smooth
gentleman, with his black hair and pale skin, and said nothing about the rumors
she'd heard. A feeling came to her that whatever happened, he should not have
her box. "Well, I'm rather fond of the box, as it is," she said carefully.
"And I've never done business with someone I met in the street. It may be
that I will want to give the box away one day, as a gift."
"I wouldn't do that, if I were you," said
Mars. "That box contains something very important, not worth much to you,
but worth a great deal to those willing to pay for it. Why not save yourself a
great deal of trouble and sell it to me? You will make a lot of money from
it."
"I'm sorry," said Clare politely, looking
at Mars directly. "But I don't feel as if I want to sell it. And it's
getting late, so I must be getting on."
"Not today, perhaps," said Mars, with a
dismissive wave. "But keep my card. You can reach me at that number
anytime." And he laughed and turned away. As he did, Clare caught sight of
his fine leather shoes. His feet were small and goat-like, and he moved on them
lightly. When he was a short distance away, he turned and smiled again.
"And don't think of destroying that box," he said. "To do so
would be quite dangerous, as it is well-protected against any type of
tampering. You cannot destroy it without destroying yourself, believe me."
Then he was gone.
When Clare got home, she stared at the card with
distaste for a long while before burning it in the grate. She looked at the
jewelry box, sitting quietly and unassumingly on the left side of her dresser,
glowing softly in the lamplight. She would have liked to believe that the
entire episode was a case of mistaken identity, but as she gazed at the box,
she feared it was not.
Of course, that was not the end of the affair of
the box, as it seemed everyone had now heard the story of its hidden treasure,
whether from Mars or by some other means. Clare no longer felt carefree as she
walked down her street, from home to school and back again. The neighbors behaved
oddly, and the formerly friendly shopkeepers on Main Street all seemed troubled
and disinclined to be social. Clare wondered what could possibly be in the box
to turn everyone's heads so completely. She didn't want to know but
thought it best to draw conclusions so she could decide what to do.
Perhaps it contained a map to a treasure, a list of names, or the plans for an invention
that would make its owner rich beyond imagining. There were many possibilities,
but no one of them seemed more likely than the rest. In the end, she decided,
it wasn't so much the contents, but the greed that mattered.
Clare began to dread the ordeal of her daily walk
to school, which she had formerly enjoyed. The loud talk and furtive glances of
her neighbors troubled her; she sometimes heard strange laughter coming from
behind the curtains of the houses. It was now November, and the air was getting
chilly. Clare looked forward every day to turning the key in her latch, putting
the kettle on to boil, and settling into the window seat of the turret (she lived
in a Victorian cottage) to read the evening away. She worked her way
slowly through all of Henry James, Dickens, and then Trollope as the
months went by, watching from her solitary seat as the seasons wheeled around.
The months turned into years. Even her old friends
seemed to have gotten wind of the story of the box, and few of them came around
any more. She sometimes heard rustling outside her window at night, and once she even heard footsteps on her porch, a hand on
the latch. When she opened the curtain, she saw a dark shape retreating.
She couldn't help but notice the altered appearance
of her neighbors; the doctor in the Queen Anne down the street, always pale
from late shifts at the hospital, now looked almost vampire-ish as he turned
his grin toward her. The minister two doors down, with his red hair and sharp
eyes, had grown vulpine and watchful, and bearded Mr. Brown, who lived across
the street and published the local newspaper ("The Intelligencer"),
had somehow grown to resemble Lon Chaney Jr. in his hairier stages. Mrs.
Carmine, who had moved in next door a year ago, had the crooked teeth and
pointed nose of a hag and swept her porch furiously as she watched Clare with
speculative eyes. When Clare was awakened one night by noises on the roof, she
instantly pictured Mrs. Carmine poking about the chimney, though how she could
have gotten up there, with all her two hundred pounds, was a mystery Clare
preferred not to consider. She decided instead that it must be bats.
Ownership of the box had made Clare a prisoner in
her home and had taken most of the sweetness out of life. "One thing I
know," she said to herself, "is that I
can't let anyone else get this box. Whatever's in it is bad, to make people
act the way they do. I suppose I must just guard it. I wish this were a fairy tale
so that I might have a godmother to tell me what to do, but since it
isn't, I'll have to do the best I can."
Do you think someone was listening? That night,
Clare dreamed of her grandmother, who had been dead for many years. She was a
small Southern woman with a lively expression, and in the dream she gave off a
decided radiance. She looked very pleased as she smiled at Clare, who felt, at
the sight of that smile, a lifting of the dread that followed her in waking
life. "You see," she said to her grandmother. "This box has
changed everything."
"Yep," her grandmother replied.
"What are you gonna do about it?"
"I don't know," said Clare. "I've
been watching this box for almost five years now, and it's getting old."
"What do you want to do?" her
grandmother persisted.
"Smash it to pieces."
"Good idea," the grandmother said.
"Someone told me that I'd end up hurting
myself if I tried to get rid of the box," Clare said. "There was a
man, Mr.--"
"Oh, him," said her grandmother.
Then she laughed. "That don't make no never mind. If that box would've
hurt you, it would have done it by now. What do you think happened to them
neighbors of yours, studying all the time on that box and how to get their
hands on it? It's ruined their looks, sure enough, and I'll tell you what--them
changes are permanent. There's no going back. But not you, honey. You watched
over that box, and never asked nothing for yourself out of it. That's kept you
going."
"You mean, he lied to me about the box, and I
could have destroyed it all this time?"
"Well, lied, honey--of course he lied,
but in a way of twisting the truth. You had to show that box it was not the
boss of you before it would let you go, and now you have. Getting rid of an old
tricksy sumpen like that is no small matter till you show it what's what. If
you want to smash it, smash it. And honey," she said, pressing her
granddaughter's hand, "get yourself out of this mess here," and she
gestured broadly and inclusively. "It'll sap the life right out of you,
sitting in a nasty place like this. And you still with a husband to get."
Clare woke up. It was only midnight, and she hadn't
been asleep long. She got up and went to the dresser. Without a second thought,
she removed all of her earrings and necklaces and put them in an empty Whitman
Sampler box. She took the jewelry box and a hammer into the living room, where she smashed the box into tiny pieces inside a large bucket. Once she was finished, she took the bucket outside. Next to the fence was a canister of acid the landlord had left after treating a swimming pool. She dumped the splinters in and watched them disintegrate with a satisfying fizz. Then she went inside and washed her hands.
"There may have been another way to do that," she said to herself. "But anyway, it's done. It's a shame to lose a pretty box, but no sense taking any chances on pulling out one paper and leaving something else behind. Anyway, I could probably lacquer a box myself." While in the kitchen, she thought
she heard a long wail in the side yard followed by a howl from somewhere down the street. Then all was still, and she listened as the silent neighborhood seemed to rearrange
itself around the fact of the now dead-as-a-doornail box.
She felt her arms and legs, and touched her head
and heart. "Well, it looks like I'm still here," she said. Then she
went to bed.
She woke up early the next morning, a sunny May
Saturday, and began to pack her clothes, her books, and her personal things.
She was not teaching this summer and had not yet renewed her contract for next
year, so there was nothing more to be said about that. She took down her
pictures and wrapped them up. She packed up her kitchen and her bathroom; she
tied a ribbon around the Whitman Sampler box. All this took a few hours. By
that time, the rental agency was open, so she went over and hired a small trailer.
Backing it up to the front porch, she piled in her boxes, pictures, roll-top
desk, and her small kitchen table. She left the futon (which had never been
comfortable) and the odds and ends that had come furnished with the
place.
In the mailbox on the corner, she dropped a note to
the landlord with half a month's rent (he had neglected for months to repair a
leaking roof, so she subtracted two weeks for that), her key, and her month's
notice. As she got into her car, she saw that her neighbor, Mr. Brown, had
emerged from his house and was trimming the hedge desultorily with his
clippers. He looked, she thought, quite depressed. The heavy hair on his face,
neck, and arms and his hollow expression were all visible in the rear view
mirror as she drove away. At the end of the street, she turned onto the main
road without looking back. At the edge of town, she rolled a window down and called, "Don't let the screen door hit you, folks!" Then she was on
her way.
(The inspiration for this story was a drive down a
street of old houses not far from where I live. I pictured it on a windy night
and knew I wanted to write a story about it. I imagined the residents as
werewolves and vampires, and it took off from there. I made up the jewelry box.)
Thursday, June 4, 2015
Who's Afraid of Aphrodite Wolf?
This year I may have set a record for number of books started but not read all the way through. Normally, it's rare for me to pick a book that I can't hang with to the end, but within the last month I've returned at least three to the library unfinished. One of them I started twice and even got most of the way through before deciding it was a bit too gloomy for a love story. A couple of others had mythological themes that seemed promising at first but lost me for one reason or another.
I seem to have more problems finishing books written within the last few years than I do with earlier ones. I perceive this to be a reflection of the unsettled times we're living in, which somehow find their way into even the most innocuous of stories, tales of romance, adventure, and suspense. It's not a reflection on the capabilities of the writers, but more a problem with my thinking I'm getting one kind of book and finding I've gotten another. It's also been the case that I didn't finish a book (Jake Arnott's The House of Rumour) because the theme, though adeptly handled, was rather dark. (This I consider to be my own judgment and not the fault of the author.)
It's one thing to be topical and another to be memorable. Occasionally, one stumbles upon a book that seems to reflect the tenor of the times unflinchingly, and one comes away the better for it. The author performs a kind of alchemical magic on contemporary themes so that they are recognizable but transmuted, a remarkable sea change akin to Heart of Darkness morphing into Apocalypse Now. I've seen it in authors like Jane Smiley, Donna Tartt, Mark Helprin, and Ian McEwan, as well as in writers previously unknown to me whose works came back to haunt me later, like Lorrie Moore, Amor Towles, and David Mitchell. (Bark, anyone? Rules of Civility? The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet?)
If I were to name a mythological idea that seems common to many of these authors' recent works, I would mention some darkness around issues of Eros. Is that surprising? You may ask what that has to do with contemporary American/world affairs, which seem on the evidence to be caught up in much drier and more prosaic issues of power and money. I agree, but for whatever reason, content connected to a disturbed Eros crops up in many of the recent works of fiction I've seen. Of course, surface content often obscures latent content, in both life and fiction, and never does a theme appear in isolation. Eros and power, and Eros and money, in particular, tend to be quite combustible combinations.
I seem to have more problems finishing books written within the last few years than I do with earlier ones. I perceive this to be a reflection of the unsettled times we're living in, which somehow find their way into even the most innocuous of stories, tales of romance, adventure, and suspense. It's not a reflection on the capabilities of the writers, but more a problem with my thinking I'm getting one kind of book and finding I've gotten another. It's also been the case that I didn't finish a book (Jake Arnott's The House of Rumour) because the theme, though adeptly handled, was rather dark. (This I consider to be my own judgment and not the fault of the author.)
It's one thing to be topical and another to be memorable. Occasionally, one stumbles upon a book that seems to reflect the tenor of the times unflinchingly, and one comes away the better for it. The author performs a kind of alchemical magic on contemporary themes so that they are recognizable but transmuted, a remarkable sea change akin to Heart of Darkness morphing into Apocalypse Now. I've seen it in authors like Jane Smiley, Donna Tartt, Mark Helprin, and Ian McEwan, as well as in writers previously unknown to me whose works came back to haunt me later, like Lorrie Moore, Amor Towles, and David Mitchell. (Bark, anyone? Rules of Civility? The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet?)
If I were to name a mythological idea that seems common to many of these authors' recent works, I would mention some darkness around issues of Eros. Is that surprising? You may ask what that has to do with contemporary American/world affairs, which seem on the evidence to be caught up in much drier and more prosaic issues of power and money. I agree, but for whatever reason, content connected to a disturbed Eros crops up in many of the recent works of fiction I've seen. Of course, surface content often obscures latent content, in both life and fiction, and never does a theme appear in isolation. Eros and power, and Eros and money, in particular, tend to be quite combustible combinations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)